Cogram vs Otter.ai
A detailed comparison to help you choose the right AI tool
C
Cogram
Cogram takes automatic notes in virtual meetings and identifies action items.
Paid 202 upvotes
O
Otter.ai
A meeting assistant that captures audio, notes, and insights effortlessly.
Freemium 801 upvotes
Key Features
Cogram
- Automatic note-taking during virtual meetings for AEC teams.
- Identification of action items from meeting discussions.
- Integration with popular virtual meeting platforms.
- Real-time collaboration for project documentation.
- Searchable meeting archives for easy reference.
Otter.ai
- Real-time audio recording and transcription of meetings
- Automated generation of meeting summaries and insights
- Integration with calendar and video conferencing tools
- Searchable transcripts for easy reference and retrieval
- Collaboration tools for sharing notes with team members
Cogram Pros
- + Streamlines project documentation and administrative tasks, saving time and reducing errors.
- + Integrates seamlessly with industry-standard tools, preserving existing workflows.
- + Offers customizable templates, ensuring consistency and reducing editing time.
- + Provides robust security features, including SOC 2 Type II certification and AES-256 encryption.
- + Enhances productivity by automating repetitive tasks and unlocking insights from project data.
- + Supports informed decision-making with an AEC-specific AI Assistant.
Cogram Cons
- − Requires initial setup and customization to align with specific firm workflows.
- − May involve a learning curve for users unfamiliar with AI-driven tools.
- − Custom pricing model may not be transparent for all potential users.
- − Limited to AEC industry, may not be suitable for other sectors.
- − Dependence on integrations may require additional setup for some users.
Otter.ai Pros
- + High transcription accuracy of up to 95%, ensuring reliable meeting documentation.
- + Automated summaries and action items save time and enhance productivity.
- + Seamless integration with popular communication tools like Zoom and Microsoft Teams.
- + Custom vocabulary feature allows for industry-specific jargon recognition.
- + Multi-language support caters to global teams.
- + Real-time transcription enables participants to focus on discussions rather than note-taking.
Otter.ai Cons
- − Some advanced features are only available in higher-tier plans.
- − Occasional inaccuracies in speaker identification in noisy environments.
- − Limited customization options for automated summaries.
- − Potential learning curve for new users unfamiliar with AI tools.
- − Dependence on internet connectivity for optimal performance.
Which Should You Choose?
Choose Cogram if:
- → You need it for capture detailed notes during project kickoff meetings.
- → You need it for track action items from design review sessions.
- → You need it for document decisions made in client consultations.
Choose Otter.ai if:
- → You need it for capture detailed notes during team meetings effortlessly
- → You need it for generate summaries for quick review after client calls
- → You need it for share meeting insights with remote team members instantly