ReviewNB
Jupyter notebook code review tool.
About ReviewNB
ReviewNB is a specialized code review tool designed for Jupyter Notebooks, offering a robust platform for data science teams to collaborate efficiently. As of 2026, the tool has become an indispensable asset for organizations leveraging Jupyter Notebooks for data analysis and machine learning projects. By integrating seamlessly with GitHub and Bitbucket, ReviewNB allows users to view notebook diffs, post comments, and track conversations directly within their repositories. This functionality streamlines the code review process, making it easier for teams to focus on meaningful changes rather than file formats. With a user-friendly interface and powerful features like rich diffs and conversation threads, ReviewNB enhances productivity and collaboration. The tool's commitment to data privacy and security, along with its flexible pricing plans, makes it accessible to a wide range of users, from small teams to large enterprises. ReviewNB stands out from competitors by offering a tailored experience for Jupyter Notebooks, making it a preferred choice for data scientists and developers alike.
ReviewNB Key Features
- Notebook diffs - view changes between notebook versions visually.
- Commenting - post comments on specific code cells for feedback.
- Conversation tracking - maintain discussions linked to code changes.
- GitHub/Bitbucket integration - seamless use within existing repositories.
- Collaboration tools - invite team members for code reviews and discussions.
ReviewNB Pricing Plans (2026)
Free
- Unlimited Public Repositories
- 10 Free Pull Requests
- Free Academic Use
- Free Open Source Use
- Limited to 10 pull requests
- No priority support
Team
- Up to 10 Users
- Unlimited Private Repositories
- Unlimited Public Repositories
- 14-Day Free Trial
- Limited to small teams
- No priority support
Business
- Up to 30 Users
- Unlimited Private Repositories
- Unlimited Public Repositories
- Priority Support
- Limited to 30 users
- Higher cost for larger organizations
ReviewNB Pros
- + Specialized for Jupyter Notebooks, offering tailored features that enhance the review process.
- + Seamless integration with popular Git platforms like GitHub and Bitbucket.
- + Rich diffs make it easy to understand changes in complex notebook files.
- + Conversation threads allow for detailed discussions and efficient collaboration.
- + Flexible pricing plans make it accessible to a wide range of users, including a free tier for open-source projects.
- + Self-hosting option provides enhanced security for enterprise users.
ReviewNB Cons
- − Limited support for GitLab due to API restrictions.
- − May require a learning curve for users unfamiliar with Jupyter Notebooks.
- − Enterprise pricing can be high for smaller organizations.
- − Requires internet access for cloud-based features, which may not suit all users.
- − Some users may find the Chrome extension necessary for optimal functionality, adding a layer of complexity.
ReviewNB Use Cases
What Makes ReviewNB Unique
Specialization in Jupyter Notebooks
Unlike general code review tools, ReviewNB is specifically designed for Jupyter Notebooks, offering features that cater to the unique needs of data science teams.
Rich Diffs
The ability to view detailed diffs for Jupyter Notebooks sets ReviewNB apart, making it easier to understand changes and ensure high-quality reviews.
Seamless Integration
ReviewNB's seamless integration with GitHub and Bitbucket ensures a smooth workflow, allowing users to manage reviews directly within their repositories.
Self-Hosting Option
For organizations with strict security requirements, the self-hosting option provides enhanced data privacy and control over the review process.
Flexible Pricing
With a range of pricing plans, including a free tier for open-source projects, ReviewNB is accessible to a wide range of users, from small teams to large enterprises.
Who's Using ReviewNB
Tech Companies
Companies like Microsoft and Google use ReviewNB to manage and review their Jupyter Notebook projects, enhancing collaboration and productivity.
Educational Institutions
Universities and colleges use ReviewNB to facilitate collaborative learning and peer reviews in data science courses.
Open Source Projects
Popular open source projects like TensorFlow and Esri leverage ReviewNB to manage contributions and maintain high-quality documentation.
Research Organizations
Research institutions use ReviewNB to collaborate on data analysis projects, ensuring accuracy and consistency in their findings.
Enterprise Businesses
Large enterprises use ReviewNB to review and manage data analysis projects, ensuring alignment with business goals and quality standards.
How We Rate ReviewNB
ReviewNB vs Competitors
ReviewNB vs CodeGeeX
CodeGeeX offers a versatile code review platform with support for multiple programming languages. However, ReviewNB excels in providing specialized features for Jupyter Notebooks, making it a better choice for data science teams.
- + Specialized for Jupyter Notebooks
- + Rich notebook diffs
- + Seamless GitHub and Bitbucket integration
- − CodeGeeX supports more programming languages
- − Broader platform support
- − Potentially lower pricing for general use
ReviewNB Frequently Asked Questions (2026)
What is ReviewNB?
ReviewNB is a code review tool specifically designed for Jupyter Notebooks, enabling seamless collaboration and review processes for data science teams.
How much does ReviewNB cost in 2026?
As of 2026, ReviewNB offers a free tier for open-source projects, a Team plan at $79 per month for small teams, and a Business plan at $249 per month for larger organizations. Enterprise pricing is available on request.
Is ReviewNB free?
Yes, ReviewNB offers a free tier for open-source and educational purposes, allowing unlimited access to public repositories and 10 free pull requests.
Is ReviewNB worth it in 2026?
For teams working extensively with Jupyter Notebooks, ReviewNB is a valuable tool that enhances collaboration and streamlines the review process, making it worth the investment.
Best ReviewNB alternatives in 2026?
Alternatives to ReviewNB include CodeGeeX, Google Antigravity, ZZZ Code AI, LMQL, and GoCodeo.
ReviewNB vs competitors in 2026?
ReviewNB stands out with its specialization in Jupyter Notebooks and seamless integration with GitHub and Bitbucket, offering features like rich diffs and conversation threads.
How to get started with ReviewNB?
To get started with ReviewNB, connect your GitHub or Bitbucket account, open a notebook, commit, or pull request, and start reviewing with rich diffs and conversation threads.
What platforms does ReviewNB support?
ReviewNB supports GitHub Enterprise, GitHub Cloud, and Bitbucket Cloud. Support for other platforms is in progress.
Is ReviewNB safe and secure?
ReviewNB is verified by GitHub and does not store any repository contents. It uses AES encryption for access tokens and offers a self-hosting option for enhanced security.
Who should use ReviewNB?
ReviewNB is ideal for data science teams, educational institutions, open-source project managers, enterprise businesses, and research organizations using Jupyter Notebooks.
What's new in ReviewNB 2026?
In 2026, ReviewNB continues to enhance its features with improved integration capabilities and support for more platforms.
How does ReviewNB compare to alternatives?
ReviewNB offers unique features like rich notebook diffs and conversation threads, making it a preferred choice for Jupyter Notebook users compared to more generic code review tools.
ReviewNB on Hacker News
ReviewNB Quick Info
- Pricing
- Freemium
- Upvotes
- 79
- Added
- January 3, 2026
ReviewNB Is Best For
- Data science teams looking for efficient collaboration tools.
- Educational institutions seeking tools for peer reviews in data science courses.
- Open source project managers needing to streamline contribution reviews.
- Enterprise businesses focused on maintaining quality in data analysis projects.
- Research organizations collaborating on data-driven projects.
ReviewNB Integrations
ReviewNB Alternatives
View all →Compare Tools
See how ReviewNB compares to other tools
Start Comparison